The least controversial amendment on the ballot, Amendment 4, seeks to streamline the process for filling vacant judicial seats, ensuring they are filled at the earliest available election date.
Currently, the Louisiana Constitution requires a special election within 12 months of a vacancy, but the new closed primary system could make that difficult. This amendment would align judicial special elections with existing gubernatorial or congressional elections when possible, reducing costs.
Arguments For and Against
Supporters say:
- Aligning special elections with regular election dates will save taxpayer money.
- The new closed primary system requires a fix to avoid election delays.
Opponents argue:
- Judges should be replaced as soon as possible rather than waiting for the next available election.
The Bottom Line
This amendment is largely a technical fix to election scheduling. Voters must decide whether to prioritize cost savings or quicker judicial appointments.
